by Islacrusez » Mon Sep 02, 2013 9:36 am
I tried a short vertical wing previously, but it didn't work out. I'll play around with some ideas a bit more, but I don't imagine ending up with a large sticky-up-bit. It would also mean the rather odd question of why is there an engine on the outside of an armour plate. I'll add a little detail to the top and bottom of the engines though, but don't hold your breath.
For casting, by my reckoning, the main engines will be on the split if not done separately. Also if I don't do the engines separately from the hull, the two main wings can't be done as a single piece. However, I'm getting an idea on how to do the main engines together with the main wings as a single piece, with a decent join that will slot into the hull.
Oooh, I just realised what I've done. I've said split mould somewhere along the line! I did in fact not mean split mould, though I see why it would make the engines so much easier to do... I'm just worried about degeneration of alignment, and damaging the piece being cast. Just something that feels more reliable about a two part mould.
As for the fore wings together with the prow, not sure if that's doable due to awkward shape involved... Can't be done using a split mould without breaking the winglets off during extraction. Two part might just survive, but there's still a few bits and pieces that could get caught, and the only way around that would be to split one half of a two-part mould.
Thinking if I do the hull as a 2-part mould, and take the rear wings off with the engines, it'll leave me with hassle on the keel. If I do it as a split-mould, it'll leave me with hassle on the wings. I think I'll take my chances with the keel.
This gives me:
Hull
Engine/wings
Keel
Gun (x2)
(the split mould would give me 2x wings instead of engine/wing+keel, so no improvement there)
For the prow... I don't know. I'm still unsure.